My Arguments on the WSJ's Article to bend to Communist China's Protectionism.

http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/12/08/remaking-doha-for-china/tab/comments/#comment-618915


Head Open Source Communist Chinese Economic Warfare Analysts position on article. I think this articles conclusion is wrong. When it states that the world should open up its investment for the Communist party to get it to open up its imports markets to the world. First of all they have to follow through with their contracts before we move forward. We are not going to open our investments for them when they have not even followed through with their import export contracts. If we talk investments it will be on equal grounds of we open up you open up. Not on grounds of we give two things to get one thing from you. No imports exports are one issue. We finish that deal then we can move to investments. The Communist Chinese still heavily use SOE’s, major subsidies, hostile laws like forced seizure of IP’s for every trader, along with laws like forced 75% of all shipping that trades with the Communist Party to be their SOE’s. Which does not even include their use of espionage and its high cyber crime rate for SOE’s. So no this article is improperly concluded we finish the first set then we can move to the next set. Not to mention the heavy abuse of their workers rights.

Furthermore, it makes no sense to see their Sovereign Wealth funds used to destroy stock markets and control foreign infrastructure. When their own rural people are still considered second class citizens. In which they do not have access to health, school, or security let alone political representation. So again, the Sovereign Wealth funds come from the illegal subsidizing of SOE’s. Which take away from the free enterprise market. Along with their workers wages and quality of life. Which is then used for economic warfare instability of other countries. Which the elitist use as their own personal econ warfare treasury. Much like the DOD report that found that there was malfeasance in a possible spook of our market place during the financial stability of the worlds markets. Which I have tracked down to major SOE’s and Sovereign Wealth funds controlled by the Communist Chinese making major movements in stock markets to cause the market to spook. In my belief and opinion. Therefore, it would not make sense to allow them to invest in the West’s or worlds infrastructure. When their own is still not being dealt with. Along these lines, the way they centralize their market places, shows that they are still a militarized economic model like the DOHA and WTO contracts tried to stop them from doing. Mainly which the SOE’s are controlled by the SASAC centralized community that act like a single cartel system. As was the example of 30 Rare earth resource companies after cloaking under different companies to pass anti trust laws. Conglomerating down to one rare earth resource company to create major anti trust violations of rare earth resources. That would not have happened if the Cartel SASAC system would have been acting like a single entity and proven as such. Along these lines. In WTO anti trust laws. It states if a country holds a surplus for a number of years and makes no way for the other countries to gain a surplus back. They are in violation of anti trust principles. Which in the conclusion of Communist China we can see their major treasury, trade, supply chain, resource, and other monopolies and surpluses, show a mens rea and guilty mind to create unfair competition for the rest of the world. Which would show their still heavily militarized economy is still the main problem with the world economies economic imbalance. Which any trade chart, resource chart, treasury chart, will show you the worlds is deflated and the Communist Chinese SOE’s, subsidies, monopolies and centralized militarily style economic control is the worlds main problem of greed and unfairness. If the world opens up its investments to them now. It will be unfair for the world as they could easily do what they have done to their imports market and still protect against foreign investments. Which we are seeing them do constantly, with manipulative laws and centralized SASAC strategies.

Rider I Thank you my suggestion is to force them to comply with first contracts before moving to any further allowance of Communist Party centralized world economic dominance.

Along these lines it is seen as their espionage views to use terrorist or what they call proxy agents to attack western economies. Like India, Israel and the US with Al Queada, and Hezzbola. 


Communist China Proxing Al Queada to attack the US Forcing Liquidation war
http://www.homelandsecurityus.net/al%20qaedas%20link%20to%20other%20countries/al_qaeda%20china%20tie.htm


Communist Chinese fund and Protect Hezzbollah and Hamas
http://samsonblinded.org/news/for-us-administration-size-does-matter-2939


Communist Chinese Banks Force Foreign banks to raise reserves while lowering their domestic banks reserves. 
Foreign Banks forced to raise reserves
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/21/china-foreign-banks-idUSL3E7LD1QZ20111021


Communist Chinese Party Owned Banks Protected
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/22/china-economy-zhejiang-rrr-idUSL4E7MM1MF20111122