Secretary Chu destroys the poor people's wallets and prepared the starving for a Communist Chinese hybrid car dumping.

Today Secretary Chu made comments that he was not working on lowering gas and that gas prices where being allowed to go higher so that research and discovery could be done to push technology that the poor citizens will not be able to afford for a very long time even if there was heavy subsidies or the Communist Chinese 16 State Owned Enterprise cartel vehicles build up in China was allowed to dump on our auto market very soon. Secretary Chu is a prime example of how high tower politics forget about the small business and just think they can give out more tax donations for subsidies instead of properly doing research and advancing while keeping an economic root important factor at a reasonable rate.

Today we see the West pays anywhere from $5 to $10. While Communist China pays around a dollar or so for gas and the middle east pays less than a dollar for gas. While also other nations economy is in surplus, pays way less for gas. While the US whose people are in need of an economic recovery have to deal with Secretary Chu's policy of keeping gas high and then hoping that Communist China's 16 SOE cartelled electrical car build up will be allowed to be dumped on the US market so the current phase of US made vehicles will be destroyed by the massive dumping of stocked overly unfairly priced cheap hybrid cars will save the day. Which by seeing this why any US oil executive or car company executive would not be all over Chu for his idea to keep gas prices high to starve US citizens before the great Communist Chinese hybrid surplus vehicle build up dump happens is beyond me.

Rider I

Difference between cold war defense of centralized economic attacks as per today.

Dear Treasury, 

Today if you know anything about the cold war financial and economic warfare. In which the Western Democracies used free enterprises and freedom, as opposed to the Soviets State Owned Enterprises and heavily oppressive centralized military economy. You would say major differences in our reactions to today's economic centralized military force the Communist Chinese. During the cold war the US was primarily worried that allowing the Soviets to be able to gain a surplus with their centralized government would allow them to use that surplus to over fund loans for development thus gaining political clout in the world markets to over export and out due the US exports for developing nations. Where in all reality the export potential is the biggest. Today, however we see both political and moderate government agencies doing nothing to combat this very same issue. We see today lots of loans for domestic stagnation to keep moving our economy down the drain. However, we see no major international development loan focus going on. This is primarily because of a failure of the US government to see that the Communist Chinese are developing 50% of the worlds needs. This means that they are gaining more market access for their exports and companies while the US and West go through major economic implosion activities exactly like the Soviets wished to implement on the Democracy and free markets. 

The idea is then to do a complete look at our international efforts. On how US departments are failing to earn enough interest on loans and have enough private enterprises matching their economic baskets with international baskets that the US has lost its ability to compete internationally. The Key to this is of course international development loans. As this is the major way for the US to gain proper political clout. Especially since the Communist Chines spent billions blaming the US on the world economic crash. When we can see that it was their State Owned Enterprises that spooked the market, which worked with Anna Chapman's espionage team to gather data on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae so they could dump stocks to spook the market. All the way to them using very predatory laws like the Innovation laws that force business to give up their IP when doing trade with them, to forcing joint ventures to get trade, all the way to centralizing the world rare earth resources so they can force all manufacturing to their country. Today we now see them doing this with the media. Where they have banned 88 western style influenced shows on their State Owned Enterprise tv channels. Then going all the way to banning all western media from any prime time market shares. Where as opposed to those sanctions in the US the Communist Chinese State Owned Enterprise channel has full access to all day market shares. They are doing so as to force US media to move to Communist China and then us innovation laws and forced joint venture laws to entrap their industrial market shares to the control of the Communist Chinese like we have seen them do the rare earth resource market places. 

As such, to defend against such cold war economic warfare cyclical activities. The best practice is to start up major international development loans so that new developing nations can be independent from the new Soviet colonialism being perpetrated by the Communist Chinese. This then can help the US start to export more goods and become less reliant on a market place that forces focuses on them so that they can take over the world and our business entities are force into joint ventures in which their SOE's gain our IP and unfair business practices against us in the rest of the world. Personally I see India as a bigger market place and do not understand why the US government has not see the herd technology the Communist Chinese espionage unit the MSS Is doing as exactly analogous to the KGB espionage units herd technology, as it is. Thus being the difference I see, the Governments lack of over-site of analogous economic warfare as applied to KGB Soviet activities and the Communist Chinese MSS activities. 

Rider I

Supreme Court Conservative Issues for POTUS Monopolized Insurance industry

Well in reality if you are a conservative you look at everything.  1.Issue Political entities benefiting from forced monopoly supreme court law The Illegal nature of the Supreme Court law that does not allow a political party or entity or person to create a monopoly in which they will benefit. The President Obama and the majority of Democrats will substantially benefit from the Monopolized insurance industry.  2. Common law of populace cognition waging war against monopolized industries.  Historical precedence. Which shows the US and Democracy fighting against monopolised industries. From everything from creating anit trust laws, all the way to three world wars. Two against a German Socialist party that wished for forced monopolized industries, and one against a Soviet empire that did monopolize every industry to be forced upon the people. Thus hundred of millions of people have died fighting this very communistic law.  3. Usury industry making billions forcing also heavy government subsidizes A conservative then looks at the view point of lets see the industry that is wish to force everyone into. Ok the medical industry. MMM the US has one of the worst medical industries that is unregulated. You can go to a foreign country and get a procedure done for under $100,000 as compared to in the US where it costs a million. With proper currency valuations stablized in reality the procedure costs about $20,000 just stabilizing the currency to a similar ratio. Then we see that unlike the legal industry there is no fair practice of charging. Where for example a pill that cost $2 to get to the hospital and $3 to store is then billed out at $120 a pill. This in itself is ridiculous. As the industry as a whole is unregulated. Then we look at the insurance industries which is a luxury industry the President himself violated felonous Supreme Court laws by forcing a monopoly which he will gain substantially from. This industry has hundreds of insurance companies that take home at the end of the year over a billion dollars. Which means mmmm medical supplies and services not regulated for fair practice, then insurance is making a billion dollars. As a consevertative I do not see the problem as to cause forced monopoliziation to gain access for everyone to balance out the US deficit cost of government paying. What I see is an industry raping literally the government and its clients. Which in any other industry like law or products it would not survive without heavy government subsidies if it is. MMMMM oh wait that is the only reason why the LIberals are pushing for a monopolistic industry cause they are having to subsidize an industry that is making billions each year and being way non fairly based on usury laws greedy.  4. The idea that citizens currently can't get medical attention is also wrong. I am indigent and have MSI which is an insuranc e program that is able to help out impovershed citizens like me. Which if the insurance companies where taxed properly the governmetn would not have to subsidize them nor pay for impovershed citizens. Instead the government forces a monopoly and allows a billion dollar insurance industry to turn into a muti trillion dollar monoplized industry.  5. Laws allowing the service industry to lead the US economy have allowed us to go deeper and deeper into recession after each natural cyclical bust. savings and loans .com and mortage. Each legislation was created to place that industry at the forefront of our economy. In which each time serious substantially economic losses in other industries like smelting manufacturing and a myraid of other services where lost due to high centralized focus on those service industries. Which if you look at the US deficit. It shows during the creation of the legislation to help those service industries a high boom. Then afterwords it shows a major bust that takes us deeper into recession than which it came out before. Thus each service industry leading to a bigger and bigger recesion. A forced monopolized industry will do the same thing. As the begging reliance on the high monopolized industry will force brain and market focus on it. Thus allowing us to lose other industries. So when it leveled out at a normal pace after the boom it would bust and take us deeper into recession than the one before. Thus causing a major depression and economic implosion. Which is seen by the WHO who traced both the major world health epidemics pig flu and bird flu back to Communist Chinese espionage biological bases in Asia. In which currently directly before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the MSS territories a major bird flu scare happened. Thus one can easily make the link to a deeper ceeded issue of economic cyclical warfare.  6. Vietnam forced military industry The Supreme Court case law on the issuse of forced industries is only in a time of major disaster in which an Executive order of war on biological issues like a epidemic of lets say flu, or major war can have a monopolized industry like health or military be forced upon the people.  Thank you I am a moderate conservative. I do not see this law as helping the US. I see it as its literally destruction and against every single value the US has every fought for and held. Which is against forced monopolization.  Rider I Rider I

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73412.html

A conversation about the Economists Coverage of Communist China.

http://www.economist.com/comment/1283584#comment-1283584

Comment section:

Rider I February 27th, 05:46
I hope that all economist readers also read the harsh criticism of the regime that currently treats ethnics and rural types as second class citizens exactly like the Jews did. While forcing all Buddhist to hang pictures of Communist leaders in the temples and oppressing their freedom to have a church with military spies or literal soldiers in each religious institution. While also specifically admitting to try and get the US to go to war with Iran so that they could destroy both the Muslim world and West world while they grow and are enriched from instigating fights with the two. All the way to literally bullying corporations and business to the point of forced monopolistic State Owned Enterprise take over.

Please read the Anti Economic Warfare blog post by the

Democracy militant Lunatic known as the current pale

Rider I
IPA and dancing ladies
Rifle and Pistol and a backpack full of books to preach Democracy.

Recommend
3
ReportPermalinkReply
veryh in reply to Rider I February 27th, 08:30
Minorities get better treatments than Han Chinese,that is just a fact.Im not a big fan of my government,but I also dont like people spread lies just to push their

Ya well obviously you need to study that then. Lies to spread agenda. Obviously you read this far on the comment sheet you are the one with an agenda. Rural people in Communist China have a second class idea. Along with the Falung Gong because they are budhist are Genocide. My friend your internet is blocked from that research. You could be living in it and would never know because the Communist agenda is to keep its people blind like Hilter did with the world as they oppressed their ethnic cultures. I do not think that you have read anything from Tibetan research, Gulug research or any kind of ethnic treatment in your country. I run a research cite called the Rider I Anti Economic Warfare you can't see it in your country. If you are in the states you should give it a read.

Rider I
Thank you but it is not a lie and again agenda comes for someone who has obviously read this far on the comment sheet just to spread something they have no clue about. Now maybe if you could read the research cites I would agree with you. But obviously you do not even know that your rural people have a second class like the Jews did in Socialist German id card. Western Journalist die in your country to get the truth to the rest of the world. While Chinese citizens are blinded by Communist propaganda agenda's.

kommonsenses

hold your horse, raider I, I wish your were that free but you ain’t.

don’t know what you are grumbling about, but aren't they are all being forced to hang pictures of democratic leaders in every government office, airport and public place? (have you been at US airport lately?)

Buddhist temples are public places and of course they can and probably are forced (by law) to hang the pictures of communist leaders, just like in your neighbourhood. They shot horses don’t they?

Rider I

Furthermore, to the other one who responded to me. No Buddhist Temples are not public places in my country. They are private religious institutions. Which the government does not control. The idea of Hanging Government pictures in a religious private institution to a free person is like North Korea being forced to hang government pictures in citizens houses.

Rider I

Rider I

Along with that in Communist China they genocided all Republican or religious entities. Who believe in the right to freedom of religion. So obviously you are not a religious person or you would not think that religion is a place where the government can intrude upon. 

Rider I

Along with that the idea that Minorities get better treatment is impossible. The Communist Chinese genocides all minorities and currently oppress any minority political group from being able to hold any office against their Bolshevist view points. So the idea that minorities have it better is impossible as not one minority is allowed into major Communist Chinese politics. Where as in the US the majority of Government workers are minorities.

Rider I

kommonsenses in reply to Rider I February 28th, 18:16
and you obviously don't know a thing about 'the communist chinese' except your pitifully brainwashed impression of them. to accuse them 'genocide every single religion' is no more far fetched than to call you republican the baby killer and mass genocide of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians.


and you have the audacity to say: 'our law does not allow government intrusion into their entities.'. do you really believe that yourself? how many churches were busted in the name of national security or something?


tell me why do you have to hang the pictures of your ruler or leader at say every airport? chinese don't do that.


look, my point is not to say you are all wrong, just that don't assume others are wrong simply because being different from your view. there is no 'holier than thou' business in international affairs.




Rider I
point well taken. However, I never said that your but your conclusion of a point that is " just that don't assume others are wrong simply because being different from your view." Has nothing to do with the fact that in the US religion is not oppressed like it is in Communist China. 


Along with that "ou obviously don't know a thing about 'the communist chinese'" I have written over 20,000 articles on them under pysdo names. Along with literally over my lifetime read research from all sides theirs too which is over hundreds of thousand. Again obvious you must not be able to read my research cite. 


If your conclusion is I know nothing about the Communist Chinese you are wrong. you are talking to one of the eldest families in the world fighting fascism. Which the Communist Chinese Party is. Next if your point is being different from my view is what I protect. Obvious you do not know the difference between Communist China's one point of view sided politics and Democracy which I stand for. Obviously you are not wrong but very off point of moderate grounds here. 

Rider I

you should really listen to Pink Floyds the wall it was written against the Soviets idea of what the Communist do with cognitional oppression of different views and cultures during the Soviet Union battle for Democracy against mono fascism. 


Rider I

Samuel L. Clemens in reply to Rider I14 mins ago

While your rhetoric is hyperbolic, I understand where you are coming from. It would be easy to criticize a regime that has made such massive mistakes were it not for the malignity of our own government. As for the conspiracy that China is attempting to bring down the West by provoking the U.S. to engage Iran, I cannot help but imagine kids egging each other on at the playground; truly this notion is as childish as "na na na boo boo". If you look at the ongoing scenario in Syria, both Russia and China have expressed reservations about a foreign occupation as Syria is its own sovereign nation and should be treated as such. Very clearly we can see China is not looking to start fights. Moreover I don't think the United States' decision to invade Iran-as if we needed any assistance with that decision-would result from any provocation on China's behalf. The U.S. is drawing itself into war with Iran by instituting the same economic-stalling sanctions placed on Japan before WWII. We all know what occurred next....In summation let's not be blinded by our own native-born biases; it only breeds animosity.

Rider I

Good point. I would not consider their regime making mistakes though. I consider them strategic economic centralized activities. A mistake is something that happens when you do something out of order or because of ignorance. A whole committee like the SASAC sitting down and preparing long research projects and specific moves is not a mistake. As for the conspiracy I will cite a PLA general which is not a conspiracy it is a fact. 

"China’s Major Gen. Zhang Zhaozhong has reportedly said that China must be prepared to fight World War III if Iran is attacked by the United States. According to Zhang’s logic, China’s security is tied to Iran’s security. Zhang further suggested that China may need to fight such a war for domestic political reasons; namely, that as China’s economy cools so will the population’s enthusiasm for the ruling Communist Party. In bad economic times, a global war would redirect popular discontent against a foreign enemy."

Foreign occupation of Syria is not something anyone wants either. The UN is not in Libya I believe except for basic security of advisers to help them secure a Democracy. I agree with the idea of a Sovereign Nation and should be treated as such. If the Communist Chinese perceive this as so. How come they are so into the Philippines Maoist Guerrilla camps, Along with Indian Maoist terrorist. Where many MSS agents are stationed. While also basically owning Pakistan with their military bases. I also see the idea of the analogy of Iran and Japan and also see that it would be more beneficial for Communist China than it would be for Iran or the US if we went to war with each other. To conclude my native born biases is breading animosity for all those genocided by the Communist Chinese. As the people they killed in their country and still oppress politically and economically in their country as Republicans are still being oppressed my friend. I love Chinese but see the Communist Chinese Regime as a necessary area of someone in this world to hold onto animosity so that they can't spread like they are doing in Africa, Nepal and other countries creating and helping create very fascist one sided more or less genocidal regimes like they are. As I think folks have a feeling they should not allow the Communist Chinese to be so dominate. But they have no clue why. So I try and help them understand. 

Rider I

Samuel L. Clemens in reply to Rider IMarch 1st, 21:38

The mistake was in reference to The Great Leap Forward. Mao did not have the intention of murdering millions of farmers when the idea of communal farming was birthed. It was an effort to stimulate economic development gone horribly awry. Mao admitted his mistake later:

The chaos caused was on a grand scale, and I take responsibility. Comrades, you must all analyze your own responsibility.

Now am I condoning the propaganda, the deception, the hegemonic form of communism that China has propagated for the past century? Certainly not. My only argument is that these "mistakes"-whatever you want to call them I am not arguing semantics-are very sensitive topics, especially for China whose country and culture has historically been subjugated by Western influence. These topics are highly impassioning so it is critical we address them pragmatically.

As for that quote from the Major Gen. China must be prepared to defend Iran in the event of an attack. China is Iran's largest importer of oil (energy contracts worth $120 billion). They additionally have long-term energy contracts to extract natural gas from the South par fields of Iran for the next 30 years. Therefore China has a vested interest in the future of Iran and cannot itself afford to lose Iran as a trading partner. As for concern over the slowing economy, hundreds of protests occur each day in China despite the continual economic growth. Most domestic citizens would actually stand to benefit from a decrease in exponential economic growth; a lower rate of inflation would result in higher real-income for domestic consumers. Thus the correlation between public dissent and a slowing economy is paradoxical. I think the dissent is coming from a society desiring more personal freedoms and a more commensurable income distribution. I think we can both agree the Communist Party is trying desperately to maintain its hold on power. I am just trying to encourage a certain amount of diplomacy in controversial issues.

Rider I

That would be a different opinion. From released Russian documents and defected Communist Chinese. Mao had it in his heart to genocide every single Farmer and sent folks from the city who fought against the Communist Chinese and could not make it to Taiwan to the same areas. Which parts of Communist China with pro Communist where able to get food but that part of Communist China was forced by soldiers not to farm and placed in strategic death camps. I am sorry you know nothing about Communist China if you think that the great leap forward was some kind of mistake. It was strategically planned to finish off his opposition which was those believing in Democracy. Those that did not flee to Taiwan where starved to death. 

I agree with the rest of your comment and find you very diplomatic. However, I am again trying to hold values and pressure against them. I am not a paid diplomat and even those have lost the strength we had against the Soviets and German Socialist. The idea of finding diplomacy is a great way to move forward. However, there is no diplomacy in Communist China. It is there way or no way. It is a o sum game with their party. From business being forced to industrial monopolized supply lines, all the way to forced ip seizures if they wish to trade with them, even further the fact that Communist China believes in fascist genocidal regimes where one single culture gets to rule all cultures without any proper different party from being able to oppose them with economics and politics. 

I find you very diplomatic I hope you find me very offensive. As I am on the offensive because the Communist Chinese spent over a billion dollars blaming the west for the world economic crash. In which they are on a heavy offensive bigger than the German Socialist SOE movements before they advanced their military through out Europe. Which was proceeded by heavy German Socialist SOE market industrial monopolization and they are even more offensive than the Soviets who at least did not lie about their intentions. So I am on the offensive and that is how I wish to be perceived as standing up against communist atheist lies about allowing cultures to exist peacefully. As no Communist I have read about or met believes in Democracy of cultures. 

The idea I should sit here and be diplomatic when the Communist Chinese are the worst offensive economic warfare regime I have ever seen since the trade route wars during the Kingdoms. I will not back down I am offensive for a good purpose and great cause Democracy multiculturalism. And not some lie of State Capitalism which is just communist or Chinese characteristics which is the same thing the Soviets and German Socialist did or the idea that they are not the worlds biggest problem and threat. They are and I will do my best to try and make that known like Larry MacDonald did to the Soviets and every MacDonald has done to any regime that tried to genocide the idea of Democracy. Which is not a fascist regime with one party voting against itself with no checks by other elders or economic powers. 

Rider I



Furthermore to your idea of a mistake. If you read their constitution the idea is to destroy all Democracy and free markets implement a transitional economic attack force of SOE's. Then to unite the world under a one world communist flag. In their constitution it states such theories of Marxist and Engels. Furthermore, if you have ever been to a multicultural hack den, you know that the higher end hackers can tell you that Mao's world conquest 150 year plan is still being used to write their white papers on their next five year plans. 


Rider I
There is no mistake it is strategic exact cultural and economic genocide. As no culture can thrive peacefully if it can't have its own economy or ownership to cognitional back against the Bolshevist culture to protect it from humans nature need to dominate and conquer. 



Furthermore, I am guessing you are not a multiculturalism. As if you where you could see that the Communist Chinese are like bonzi tree keepers. They have kept the worlds cultures of the West and Democracy very small while they have grown very big. Which all the West could do was help India to grow as big to counter check them. Which today we are losing at economically. Which is a bud-hist theory about Maoist 150 year plan. 


Rider I

Samuel L. Clemens in reply to Rider IMarch 2nd, 19:21

There are a lot of points you are making that I just cannot follow. It would simply not make sense to eradicate all of the farmers who are growing the rice to feed urban industry if Mao's vision is economic growth and industrialization. It seems nonsensical does it not? The U.S. is still the most influential country in the world. That is just a fact. Am I concerned that China is becoming more powerful? Absolutely not. They have massive social and environmental issues that need addressing in the next 20 years if they want to be considered a serious developed nation. Thus I think their main concerns are domestic, not world domination that you would so quickly concede. I definitely China needs to be pressured on its income inequality, its treatment of the environment and things of the like. However to have Marxist rhetoric in their constitution is not necessarily a bad thing. If you read any Marx, which I hope you have, you will see that pure communism will evolve out of capitalism. Marx would assert capitalism alienates the laborer from his or her own product. Capitalism has its own very obvious pitfalls as well thus we should not be pushing one economic system over another. Moreover, China has made huge steps towards adopting a more capitalist economy. The creation of stock markets, the allowance of FDI, these are huge steps towards a free-market economy considering where China was 30 years ago.

Finally your criticism of China's economic propaganda is hypocritical. Our media is renown for its bias. Take a look at how Arabs have been portrayed over the past 20 years. Additionally any serious intellectual studying economics would not pretend the U.S. didn't have a huge part in the global economic collapse. Many European banks had invested in those MBS packages that were poorly underwritten. Home values plummeted, people defaulted, the MBS packages became essentially worthless, thus resulting in a massive reduction in asset values on the bank's balance sheets. Therefore we can see the hand the U.S. played in the global crisis. Overall, the crisis has more to do with debt and risk but that is another matter.

Rider I

Nonsensical to eradicate farmers. My friend have you read anything about Communist China. Mao wanted to kill all farmers who owned lands and presented funds for city local parties to do such and place them in camps so they could not farm so their farms became state owned property. Make sense you should read about it. He did the same thing Hitler did. It is a Machiavellian principle of choosing and enemy to concentrate the people. Mao chose individual land owners as his Jewish population. 

"The U.S. is still the most influential country in the world." Not if you look at trade statistics or development statistics. The US trade is way less than the Communist Chinese. Historical the worlds influence has been done by the biggest trader. Along with that the Communist Chinese own 50% of all the worlds development contracts. Thus meaning any new relevant influence in the world is going to them. Militarily influential yes fact of influential as a whole no that is a partial fact. More powerful countries usually have very bad social and environmental problems. Look at the US during its industrial revolution. Where it was becoming the worlds biggest super power because of its ability to produce trade influence. Writing in first person is ok but again if we go I's I have 4 I websites with tens of thousands of documents and again my friend I have written many more than I have collected. If they want to be considered a development nation. That is curious Communist China is more developed in its country than any country is. As it has the biggest developed cities, agriculture, civil sectors military and biggest developed surplus and financial systems. What do you consider developed. If you considered spread of wealth as developed. Well then fascist economies that centralize wealth to state owned enterprises never become developed. Yes again I have stated I have read Das Capitalist and Marxism too. You state Marxism will evolve out of Capitalism. I state Communist causes genocide and cultural destruction by centralization of individual wealth's to leaders of power. Where capitalism allows for each culture and individual to own their own to compete with economics against the powers so as to remove them when tyrannical. Communism gives no way to peaceful remove human tyranny. I do not think that genocide is a good thing. I did meet the head of the USA Communist party and he said that yes genocide would be necessary for Communism. As all capitalist or Republicans and Democrats would have to stop thinking that way or die for Communism to take over. 

MMM this is funny you cite Marxist theories then state Communist China has moved substantially towards more capitalist economy. Your wrong if you read Das Capital like you state Communism evolves out of Capitalism. What Communist China is doing is exactly what Marxist states would have to be done. Using major Communist tools of SOE's in free markets to destroy free markets to centralize wealth to the SOE's. So as to crash the markets then allow the SOE's to take over to implement full state owned or commune control. Their stock markets are majority owned by SOE's their FDI is pure SOE sovereign wealth funds. China's propaganda unit is a literal trillion dollar institution that is run by the Communist Chinese party. All of our media together does not have that power of cognition. Along with that free market media is owned by different entities and cultures and parties. The Communist Chinese propaganda is owned by one single party that is part of their bigger Das Capital plan as per again Marxist strategy. Which states media would have to be controlled in the bigger transition out of free markets that allow individuals to own their own labors towards a communal ownership. Hypocritical no ours is media, theirs is propaganda. Arabs over the past 20 years. If you have been to the Middle East you will see that free media is just stating the facts. You should go it is an amazing conservative place. As for the world economic destruction. I can say of course we all played a part. But again the Communist Chinese would not take any blame at all and blamed it all on the US. When the Communist Chinese where the ones who used their SOE stock enterprises to spook our market and cause a crash along with Al Queada and Russian Federation enterprises as per Secret Weapons written by Kevin Freeman. The housing market could have easily eased its debt trading as other cycles have. But the incurred of three major economic terrorist countries against our economic structure and country played a huge part in that crash. Not to mention 30 years of Communist China's SOE's banks writing off bad debt loans without accounting for them in their deficit. Helped $50 trillion in Western value dissapear almost over night to a black whole in Communist China's SOE companies quarterly recapitalization without keeping track of their debt. 

Furthermore, these actions taken during the world crash where the same actions taken during our last depression by the German Socialist. Which also believed in Marxist idea of Communal control of economies. Where the German Socialist where able to crash our economy through major predatory actions. Which the Economic Warfare Bureau then started the SEC to try and stop future economic terrorist organizations from doing that. However, with new high technology the Communist Chinese where able to direct Al Queada as per their book stating they where Unconventional Warfare and Russia as per Anna Chapman's arrest for following MSS orders to attack the real estate market. Therefore, in all reality if we see these three institutions did not act with impunity towards our stock markets. Then we would have seen a much cooler system than the world crash system. So I am sorry you think the US was to blame but obviously you have not done your research on the issue. Along with that we can get into legislative economic warfare done by another socialist communist group. That has forced three service bell curve reliance's on the US. First being the savings and loans, then the .com then the mortage industry. Each legislation by this socialist group that states they wish to implode the US economy to destroy it. Left a deeper and deeper crash after each normalization of the industry. As we would lose more and more industries to the Communist Chinese. This last service bell curve reliance we had ten industries in the US go extinct. Which means each time the service bell curve would normalize. The lost industries that cushioned us before caused a bigger crash as we had nothing to hold back on for GDP. Which again this group has its funding through Communist Chinese SOE's and Russian SOE's also. So its hard bitten to say you know alot or some about Communist China and you are more or less trying to state that Communist China is a good thing. Then again I do enjoy the feedback and I think you like learning from me. As if we I's my cite will show you who ra is. 

Rider I

China's State Grid in talks to buy AES' U.S. wind assets:sources

Gary Locke a US Commerce Secretary heavily thought with mounting evidence to be an Communist Chinese MSS espionage agent or spy. Allowed 80% of the US green tech stimulus to go over seas to crush the US green tech industries. Which is analogous to the Soviets trying to crush the nuclear physics energy. As the Nuclear industries of microwaves and other physics where needed to power our leadership in world wide energy production and new weapons defense programs. Since Gary Locke did not heed or help any company that came to them as the Stimulus was overwhelming allowed without any say or stop or committee from Gary Locke to be taken overseas. The whole industry wen down to last place. Now we see the Communist Chinese espionage units the MSS that control the SASAC which is the centralized economic unit of Communist China just like the Soviet KGB spies that admitted to the nuclear espionage economic attacks, are taken coming into finish off the industrial monopolistic hold on the US green tech industries.

I as the one of the most knowledgeable person on Communist China say not to any State Owned Communist Chinese party owning US major new high technological industries. As per North Korea, Vietnam the actions by Communist China to help Al Queada attack and praise them when they did against the USA. Say that they should not be allowed to under common law of fascist governance as compared to Democracy governance.

Rider I

my Rebuttal to this article.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/27/us-aes-chinastategrid-wind-idUSTRE81Q0QL20120227

Letter to the President about Anchoring Gas prices to development loans.

Dear President Obama,

I saw a picture of you looking like Teddy Rough Ryber without your gun. As you where holding your hand like you had a gun and holding your middle finger. Sucks to be a Democrat, if i was president I would be packing the last thing any person shoots at me I shoot back.
Anyways I have found a new code in the economic warfare. The code is simple it is called gasoline anchoring. It is where the Communist Chinese use Venezeulian and Iranian mines off the Stock market so they can't be attacked and driven up or down. This then anchors their prices at a pretty steady level. As compared to the US and West's constant rising at a much much higher level than theirs. This then can be compounded by a simple set of US world oil anchor mines. We could easily give development loans to a couple of countries in need of markets for us to export to to create oil mines. Then we get a good contract like Venezeula did to the Communist Chinese for development loans, and like they did with Iran. This then will anchor a gas prices in the stock market and drive the prices back down.
Theory anchoring gas prices through development loans.

Rider I

How to stop volatile Stock attacks by economic terrorist on oil.

Today oil is the worlds primary source of value and creation. Thus it is the most important thing in the world. Today we see that the Communist Chinese gain oil at a extravagantly low price, as well as the Muslim radicals who do wish to be fascist like the Communist Chinese and take over the world for their idea of monolithic race and culture.

So then we get to major racist genocidal regimes controlling and gaining the majority of the cheap oil in the world. One does it through creation and control of creation by using physical being as per a factory of faith to destroy any of those who wish to drill against them. Which they need to remember that their faith is not the only one with a factory. Then the other is a system based off of centralized wealth that the elitist control in sovereign wealth funds instead of being spread out through the people through free market and individual ownership. Speaking on the Middle East and Communist China and still wanting to play Russia.

Where as the west is being shot in the foot thanks to retarded hard core liberals who do not wish to go against the Communist international development, nor to drill. Even though they are against way but would rather pay those who force us into war and kill us and wish to destroy us to do.  As their minds are melted with to much dope feining. dope fein dope fien your a dope fien. Which is ok its free American however, when they are enabled to place two and two together and see that their beloved liberal society will be destroyed if they keep allowing the enemy to control the roots of our economy.

So then, we see how do we stop this. Well simple, we look into the world we see the two major regimes the Muslim fascist and the Communist fascist genociding a specific area of people and land, lets say Africa, oh yes well no its actually Africa. Which by the way the liberals are allowing to happen by stopping the Republicans from drilling and allowing major foreign development loans, so the Republic has to go to the dark temples to get them done. So the liberals and their lets not drill lets not develop allow genocide and lets get destroyed by our enemies as we fund them and they way over charge us.

 I have been to Africa and seen it first hand laying in the mudd with a scope watching PLA generals give orders to kill full scale villages where then oh a year later theres an SOE there with Hans living everywhere.

So I will have to edit this as it is my first draft and I am upset that this gasoline thing has got this far. However, for the first brain storm idea the basic idea of solution is to fight back legally and properly. The whole time I was there, i saw MSS agents enriching the genociders while the christians who where being genocided where dying and nobody was helping them. I asked has nobody come to you for loans yet? They said no, I said nobody come to you to mine minerals for you tribe or teach you how to create a market to fight back. They said no.

So my idea is to create loans to places like that to good Democracy proper Christian non genocidal folks who want to compete against the fascist Muslims and Communist who if you have never been to the bush. So the idea is to create a couple anchors where they get to work and make money for their culture and Democracy beliefs to fight back legally and properly. Then after that the west will have a couple anchors like the middle east does in Iran and Venezuela.

Rider I


and that is why I do not believe in state owned enterprises or communism as it is the same thing. As any non ability to enrich a culture or an opposing party means complete genocide of it. So if there is private enterprises all can compete fairly and use the government as a moderator or a balancing governance tool not a controlling tool. 

Idea of how to get Gasoline back down to $2.50 a gallon

Dear International Republican Institute, 

The idea that Gasoline cost way to much is very true. I just got down reading the book Secret Weapons by Kevin Freeman and he explains in detail how the Communist Chinese and the Muslim radicals work our stock market system that is still not regulated to cause major economic damage to our system. For example, if today you where to watch the stock market you would see primarily Asian Stock agencies tied to the Communist Chinese Party and middle eastern stock markets tied to extremist muslim radicals driving up the price of our oil on the stock market. While the Communist Chinese and Muslims are able to receive oil to gas at $.65 to $1. a gallon. However, the whole west as a whole due to this non realized issue is forced to implode its economy at receiving our life blood of economy at gas from $4 through $10 a gallon. This is ridiculous and obviously because there is no economic warfare institution inside of the International Republican Institute. If there was then somebody would recognize this and move on it to stop it as it is every easy to stop. 

The easy way to stop the economic implosion by economic terrorist that wish to implode our economy is simple. The idea is we need to get more development loans to areas where the communist chinese and radical muslims are forcing fascist single party genocide on the people. In doing so, we could gain specific interest in the oil fields so they could trade with us at Venezuelian and Iran style prices. Thus, if they stayed off the NASDEQ and stock markets then they could not be economically attacked to force raised oil prices on the west. This then would give the west a steady supply of oil at a reasonable cost. In which according to my rough estimates if we where to make two major development loans in this matter with this strategy in mind. We could easily drop the US's cost of gas back down to $3 a gallon or so. This would easy inflation and help with the unemployment as things became much cheaper to create and consumer demand goes up as we are not paying into the Communist or Muslim economic warfare stock traps. 

If you would like to hire me to work on the International Republican Institute Economic warfare team or to help start one please let me know. I have two years of non stop study on this matter and see the US has a serious brain drain in this area. 

Rider I