This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation.

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/


"To your self therefore I crave leave to present, what I know you are able to protect; not with sword, but by reason; & not that only, but what by your acceptance you are able to give a lustre to." "You have left no stone unturned, that the turning thereof might conduce to the discovery of what was and worthy to be known."

Henry Agrippa, Chevalier



One man and his mission to hold the Communist Chinese to their contracts to transition into a Free Market and a Democracy. Away from the fascist 75% owned economy by the party and controlled there of, and the non top down people ran country not military run country. One man against the Communist Chinese Party. Viva La Resistonce. You will learn to let go of the smelly blanky.


If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Difference between cold war defense of centralized economic attacks as per today.

Dear Treasury, 

Today if you know anything about the cold war financial and economic warfare. In which the Western Democracies used free enterprises and freedom, as opposed to the Soviets State Owned Enterprises and heavily oppressive centralized military economy. You would say major differences in our reactions to today's economic centralized military force the Communist Chinese. During the cold war the US was primarily worried that allowing the Soviets to be able to gain a surplus with their centralized government would allow them to use that surplus to over fund loans for development thus gaining political clout in the world markets to over export and out due the US exports for developing nations. Where in all reality the export potential is the biggest. Today, however we see both political and moderate government agencies doing nothing to combat this very same issue. We see today lots of loans for domestic stagnation to keep moving our economy down the drain. However, we see no major international development loan focus going on. This is primarily because of a failure of the US government to see that the Communist Chinese are developing 50% of the worlds needs. This means that they are gaining more market access for their exports and companies while the US and West go through major economic implosion activities exactly like the Soviets wished to implement on the Democracy and free markets. 

The idea is then to do a complete look at our international efforts. On how US departments are failing to earn enough interest on loans and have enough private enterprises matching their economic baskets with international baskets that the US has lost its ability to compete internationally. The Key to this is of course international development loans. As this is the major way for the US to gain proper political clout. Especially since the Communist Chines spent billions blaming the US on the world economic crash. When we can see that it was their State Owned Enterprises that spooked the market, which worked with Anna Chapman's espionage team to gather data on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae so they could dump stocks to spook the market. All the way to them using very predatory laws like the Innovation laws that force business to give up their IP when doing trade with them, to forcing joint ventures to get trade, all the way to centralizing the world rare earth resources so they can force all manufacturing to their country. Today we now see them doing this with the media. Where they have banned 88 western style influenced shows on their State Owned Enterprise tv channels. Then going all the way to banning all western media from any prime time market shares. Where as opposed to those sanctions in the US the Communist Chinese State Owned Enterprise channel has full access to all day market shares. They are doing so as to force US media to move to Communist China and then us innovation laws and forced joint venture laws to entrap their industrial market shares to the control of the Communist Chinese like we have seen them do the rare earth resource market places. 

As such, to defend against such cold war economic warfare cyclical activities. The best practice is to start up major international development loans so that new developing nations can be independent from the new Soviet colonialism being perpetrated by the Communist Chinese. This then can help the US start to export more goods and become less reliant on a market place that forces focuses on them so that they can take over the world and our business entities are force into joint ventures in which their SOE's gain our IP and unfair business practices against us in the rest of the world. Personally I see India as a bigger market place and do not understand why the US government has not see the herd technology the Communist Chinese espionage unit the MSS Is doing as exactly analogous to the KGB espionage units herd technology, as it is. Thus being the difference I see, the Governments lack of over-site of analogous economic warfare as applied to KGB Soviet activities and the Communist Chinese MSS activities. 

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment