Muhtar Kent is a Business man. He sees things as a business. So he sees markets and for his business alone. He does not act as a social conscious of the people nor as the entity of which he acts as a CEO of. This is normal as per most businesses. The ideas is that currently the Communist Chinese are funding and protecting major terrorist campaigns all over the world to destroy Democracy. Muhtar Kent does not see Democracy he sees a business market. He is the type of personality where if his own country had to go Communist as per the one who he is trying to allow to invade our markets with State Owned Enterprises. He would predominantly fund Communism in the west.
The view set of such is the he sees the Communist funding Capitalism so why not fund Communism. Instead of the 1980 treaty with the Communist Chinese that stated over the next 30 years the SOE dominance and centralized economy was to stop and or shrink substantially. Today that SOE centralization is stronger than ever and the companies are unbeatable in supply chain cartels and market place dominance. There is not one company Coca Cola or otherwise that can stand up to the SASAC as a centralized economy to properly and farily compete. As such, I can't just this man in the social context for pushing for Democracy of the Communist Party.As the brats that are taking it over love the SOE's and think that is the reason why their economy is doing so well. Which is true it is the main problem for the worlds terrorist and economic instability. As per four books cited on my special library collection. Therefore, I must see this man as a marketist. Which I will now right a prose on his ability to see markets and understand issues in market places. As compared to his SASAC soda counterpart which is about to destroy the Coca Cola company and overtake its domestic and international market shares are per a five year market out look. Which again his views and his clerks do not take into account.
A Market is one who understand business. The idea that business exist is because of Democracy. The state owned system or what sympathetic to the Han Communist Chinese racist genocidal take over of the world economy state as a State Capitalism. Is the very destruction of any market place. This is simple stated as the majority of countries that use SOE's as up to 70% of the worlds economy are run by single fascist regimes. Which do not in anyway shape or form run a free market system. No matter what they may flont in front of your eyes with their 25% or less free enterprises market shares.
The basic system they are running is exactly like the Soviets ran. It is a basic structured system where a small amount of free enterprises are allowed to exist. Only through control of the single fascist party system. As any major free enterprise like Huwaei has to be run by a very high ranking Communist Party member. Which allows the Communist Party to still control that entity as a cartel system. The Soviets ran a system in which 25% of their market was run by the Bolshevist espionage agents known as the KGB. This was done as the front for the idea that the Soviets where someday going to become a free market or that they where. As State Capitalism which is just the basic constitution of the principle of using the state to destroy individual ownership, is capitalism and Democracy. It is not, the (market) itself is a system based on freedoms.
A market is a place where folks can go and freely trade. The definition of a market is based on the old Templar Knights who ran markets and allowed individuals to trade as they wished without King or Church interfering and just asking a few penances per trade to allow them to trade without influence from church or King. Which became known as taxes and a free market. The Communist Chinese place of trade is still not even definable under the definition of a market place. As no trade of even the small enterprise goes without the Communist Party making sure they have control over it with the SASAC.
The SASAC is based on the idea of destroying the free market system of Democracy. Which is known to you as a Communist wish to racisticaly and genetically give one race control of all moving values via their single party monopolies. Therefore, lets get into Dr. Kent's push for a free trade system with Communist China.
This idea of a pushing for a free trade system and everything will work out is the same thing that Political Western Union leaders did for the Nazi's. Which was the idea that we would trade with Hitlers 75% of free enterprises that where stolen from the Jews and other German's and forced control through the German Socialist party. At which that time, the Western world thought if we just trade freely with their SOE's that it would work out in the long run. This was not true. As we saw it allowed him to centralize major wealth's to one single party. Thus destroying the worlds market place by allowing for the basic opposition to the definition of a market place. Which is communism, the basic control of all people's wealth by a few single party leadership entities, with no check from capital or politics on either the trade of value or the civil rights of human kind.
So now that we have shown that the Communist Chinese with their do not even meet the basic definition of a market place. As it is not the common knowledge since nor the even todays sense of market. We now move on to the basic idea of free trade. Free trade is a system where one countries citizens are allowed to trade with another countries citizens without the government being involved at all or with minor tax systems to help the people who need help. This then would destroy the basic of a military, country lines, separation of party leadership between values and the Democracy system as a whole. As applied to the Communist Chinese centralized economy. Of course in a vacum saying Canada, or France trading with the USA as a free trade system would be a better idea. Even then, we have our government rows about things, like military creations and necessary needs of defense from invasion.
Therefore, we could say that Muhtar Kent is pushing for the destruction of a market system by allowing a centralized government controlled economy to trade freely with the worlds biggest and closest thing too, not exactly a free market system, the USA. Some would say that no State Capitalism is still capitalism. That is impossible and at the most an i radical decision of theories. As Capitalism is tied directly to Democracy. Therefore, speaking about a marketist without actually speaking on ones views of social governance is almost impossible. Even though I did state that there is a problem with the definition of markets with the market itself is not a market as it is controlled by the single centralized governmental institution. I think that is about as far as I can go without actually speaking on the matter of how Democracy is very closely tied with a market place.
So lets get into that idea of how Democracy can't exist without a capitalist system or what knowledgeable folks about the root of a market system call a market system. The idea that a government can control economics at such a high rate past defense of the people or providing for the very sick or mental enable to support themselves; is called communism. No matter if it is a fascist government party doing it, one single entity running a whole country or the idea of every single person not owning anything so that only the elite of the people manage the wealth of all. Anything else below the poverty level is called socialism. Which the USA is, at the very best a system with basic socialist principles, like officers, military, schools, health care and the rest at poverty level market shares.
Democracy is the idea that any party can form as long as peaceful and not creating terrorist ideas of destroying economy, government or social structures of peaceful keeping. Anything else in a Democracy is oppressed passed the form of forming. Democracy is not a fascist system as those sympathetically calling the Communist Chinese market miracles is. As they are completely 100% analogized to the Soviets Nazi's. Democracy is not a system where single party says what is good for all those workers and elites, that would be called a form of Communist fascism. Democracy is the idea that any peaceful coalition may with use of proper free markets and their own parties individual earnings take on the current status quo for proper leadership of the people to speak out, protect, help moderate and referee. That is Democracy.
Democracy does not work if all groups, clans, rallies, proletariats, communes, political parties or otherwise can't own their own single groups desires and wishes, thus by value creation. The reason why is that everybody is different. The market system allows for natural occurring of a changing in hand of value from one nexus of cohesion to the next. This cohesion as a natural form can tell you who the best leaders in the current status quo can be. As they are the ones providing the issues of what is necessary the whims of the people and desire of such. However, if one single party is allowed to use the government for their own personal value creations then we can see that they are not necessarily representing the status quo but are oppressing other clans from being able to create their own value to show that their people wish for or would peacefully like to fight for.
Thus lets get again to the most blatant communist fascist system ever the Nazi regime. The jews in the area where the best marketist as they where the most culturally accepted form of straight shooting type folks business is business. The Nazi's knew this. They needed their market shares to create enough funds to control the people for their parties wishes and desires. Which of course was as any's is world domination and destruction of all opposition. So they destroyed Democracy, and implemented a Communist Fascism. Where Nazi German was controlled by a single group of wishes and whims those using the State Owned Enterprise to oppress any and all other groups from speaking out or being heard and being able to properly protect and fight for their cause, or their people or their whims and desires.
So what is capitalism, is the idea that a single party can capitalize over all others no matter who strong, is it the idea that a single company can take over all things and control all, or is Capitalism the idea that it derives from the market system where monopolies are not allowed, and whims of desires should not be stopped by any fascist group or clan by being allowed to use the government in their own whims desires without allowing for proper opposition at the similar or exact level of value creation. I would have to say as grand child of the ones who created the market system. That capitalism is Democracy, the idea that one may capitalize on the whims of the populace so long as not monopolistic in nature as that would oppress the whims and desires of an opposing whims and desires. .As no one human is anything like the other as we all have different whims and desires and non one system or party or clan can represent us all. Therefore, Muhtar Kent's wish to have free trade with communist china can really be seen as the wish to destroy the Democracy system as a whole.
Rider I
The view set of such is the he sees the Communist funding Capitalism so why not fund Communism. Instead of the 1980 treaty with the Communist Chinese that stated over the next 30 years the SOE dominance and centralized economy was to stop and or shrink substantially. Today that SOE centralization is stronger than ever and the companies are unbeatable in supply chain cartels and market place dominance. There is not one company Coca Cola or otherwise that can stand up to the SASAC as a centralized economy to properly and farily compete. As such, I can't just this man in the social context for pushing for Democracy of the Communist Party.As the brats that are taking it over love the SOE's and think that is the reason why their economy is doing so well. Which is true it is the main problem for the worlds terrorist and economic instability. As per four books cited on my special library collection. Therefore, I must see this man as a marketist. Which I will now right a prose on his ability to see markets and understand issues in market places. As compared to his SASAC soda counterpart which is about to destroy the Coca Cola company and overtake its domestic and international market shares are per a five year market out look. Which again his views and his clerks do not take into account.
A Market is one who understand business. The idea that business exist is because of Democracy. The state owned system or what sympathetic to the Han Communist Chinese racist genocidal take over of the world economy state as a State Capitalism. Is the very destruction of any market place. This is simple stated as the majority of countries that use SOE's as up to 70% of the worlds economy are run by single fascist regimes. Which do not in anyway shape or form run a free market system. No matter what they may flont in front of your eyes with their 25% or less free enterprises market shares.
The basic system they are running is exactly like the Soviets ran. It is a basic structured system where a small amount of free enterprises are allowed to exist. Only through control of the single fascist party system. As any major free enterprise like Huwaei has to be run by a very high ranking Communist Party member. Which allows the Communist Party to still control that entity as a cartel system. The Soviets ran a system in which 25% of their market was run by the Bolshevist espionage agents known as the KGB. This was done as the front for the idea that the Soviets where someday going to become a free market or that they where. As State Capitalism which is just the basic constitution of the principle of using the state to destroy individual ownership, is capitalism and Democracy. It is not, the (market) itself is a system based on freedoms.
A market is a place where folks can go and freely trade. The definition of a market is based on the old Templar Knights who ran markets and allowed individuals to trade as they wished without King or Church interfering and just asking a few penances per trade to allow them to trade without influence from church or King. Which became known as taxes and a free market. The Communist Chinese place of trade is still not even definable under the definition of a market place. As no trade of even the small enterprise goes without the Communist Party making sure they have control over it with the SASAC.
The SASAC is based on the idea of destroying the free market system of Democracy. Which is known to you as a Communist wish to racisticaly and genetically give one race control of all moving values via their single party monopolies. Therefore, lets get into Dr. Kent's push for a free trade system with Communist China.
This idea of a pushing for a free trade system and everything will work out is the same thing that Political Western Union leaders did for the Nazi's. Which was the idea that we would trade with Hitlers 75% of free enterprises that where stolen from the Jews and other German's and forced control through the German Socialist party. At which that time, the Western world thought if we just trade freely with their SOE's that it would work out in the long run. This was not true. As we saw it allowed him to centralize major wealth's to one single party. Thus destroying the worlds market place by allowing for the basic opposition to the definition of a market place. Which is communism, the basic control of all people's wealth by a few single party leadership entities, with no check from capital or politics on either the trade of value or the civil rights of human kind.
So now that we have shown that the Communist Chinese with their do not even meet the basic definition of a market place. As it is not the common knowledge since nor the even todays sense of market. We now move on to the basic idea of free trade. Free trade is a system where one countries citizens are allowed to trade with another countries citizens without the government being involved at all or with minor tax systems to help the people who need help. This then would destroy the basic of a military, country lines, separation of party leadership between values and the Democracy system as a whole. As applied to the Communist Chinese centralized economy. Of course in a vacum saying Canada, or France trading with the USA as a free trade system would be a better idea. Even then, we have our government rows about things, like military creations and necessary needs of defense from invasion.
Therefore, we could say that Muhtar Kent is pushing for the destruction of a market system by allowing a centralized government controlled economy to trade freely with the worlds biggest and closest thing too, not exactly a free market system, the USA. Some would say that no State Capitalism is still capitalism. That is impossible and at the most an i radical decision of theories. As Capitalism is tied directly to Democracy. Therefore, speaking about a marketist without actually speaking on ones views of social governance is almost impossible. Even though I did state that there is a problem with the definition of markets with the market itself is not a market as it is controlled by the single centralized governmental institution. I think that is about as far as I can go without actually speaking on the matter of how Democracy is very closely tied with a market place.
So lets get into that idea of how Democracy can't exist without a capitalist system or what knowledgeable folks about the root of a market system call a market system. The idea that a government can control economics at such a high rate past defense of the people or providing for the very sick or mental enable to support themselves; is called communism. No matter if it is a fascist government party doing it, one single entity running a whole country or the idea of every single person not owning anything so that only the elite of the people manage the wealth of all. Anything else below the poverty level is called socialism. Which the USA is, at the very best a system with basic socialist principles, like officers, military, schools, health care and the rest at poverty level market shares.
Democracy is the idea that any party can form as long as peaceful and not creating terrorist ideas of destroying economy, government or social structures of peaceful keeping. Anything else in a Democracy is oppressed passed the form of forming. Democracy is not a fascist system as those sympathetically calling the Communist Chinese market miracles is. As they are completely 100% analogized to the Soviets Nazi's. Democracy is not a system where single party says what is good for all those workers and elites, that would be called a form of Communist fascism. Democracy is the idea that any peaceful coalition may with use of proper free markets and their own parties individual earnings take on the current status quo for proper leadership of the people to speak out, protect, help moderate and referee. That is Democracy.
Democracy does not work if all groups, clans, rallies, proletariats, communes, political parties or otherwise can't own their own single groups desires and wishes, thus by value creation. The reason why is that everybody is different. The market system allows for natural occurring of a changing in hand of value from one nexus of cohesion to the next. This cohesion as a natural form can tell you who the best leaders in the current status quo can be. As they are the ones providing the issues of what is necessary the whims of the people and desire of such. However, if one single party is allowed to use the government for their own personal value creations then we can see that they are not necessarily representing the status quo but are oppressing other clans from being able to create their own value to show that their people wish for or would peacefully like to fight for.
Thus lets get again to the most blatant communist fascist system ever the Nazi regime. The jews in the area where the best marketist as they where the most culturally accepted form of straight shooting type folks business is business. The Nazi's knew this. They needed their market shares to create enough funds to control the people for their parties wishes and desires. Which of course was as any's is world domination and destruction of all opposition. So they destroyed Democracy, and implemented a Communist Fascism. Where Nazi German was controlled by a single group of wishes and whims those using the State Owned Enterprise to oppress any and all other groups from speaking out or being heard and being able to properly protect and fight for their cause, or their people or their whims and desires.
So what is capitalism, is the idea that a single party can capitalize over all others no matter who strong, is it the idea that a single company can take over all things and control all, or is Capitalism the idea that it derives from the market system where monopolies are not allowed, and whims of desires should not be stopped by any fascist group or clan by being allowed to use the government in their own whims desires without allowing for proper opposition at the similar or exact level of value creation. I would have to say as grand child of the ones who created the market system. That capitalism is Democracy, the idea that one may capitalize on the whims of the populace so long as not monopolistic in nature as that would oppress the whims and desires of an opposing whims and desires. .As no one human is anything like the other as we all have different whims and desires and non one system or party or clan can represent us all. Therefore, Muhtar Kent's wish to have free trade with communist china can really be seen as the wish to destroy the Democracy system as a whole.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment