However, the idea that ones control of the vote of values should be allowed to destroy the whims of another values is not considered a Democracy way, nor capitalist way. As capitalism would be destroyed if that was allowed to happen. Thus as in any system capitalism can't destroy itself or it destroys the basic idea of Democracy which protects it as it needs capitalism to stay alive and form real issues.
The oppossing idea would say no nobody needs own anything and that all humans could form groups and coahibitions on their own whims and values to vote for status quo. Problem is the reality of human beings, we are dominate intellegent position. If one group is allowed to lead without any proper check without violence we see what goes on in fascist or communist countries. Centralization of wealth like the Soviets, or the Communist Chinese soverign wealth funds, or the basic idea of tribal genocide over those who oppose them like we saw in the Soviet Union of genocide of all Democracy citizens, along with in Communist China the same idea that all farmers or individual home owners where killed and or taken to a desolute place of the country and forced to live there for starvation. and not allowed to farm or survive or figure out how to thrive.
The idea of Fascism and Communist beg the question of violence of change of power. As even when most communist regimes or fascist regimes are voted out peacefully through the idea of the human beings without need of power will just hand over their power when asked. Never happened anytime in human history. It is not human nature. So the best the human species knows of social goverance is Democracy, it allows for capitalism to express whims and desires of the populace by usingn hteir own personally owned and well protected desires and values to be placed in certain areas of leadership. With of course the sacred mac's in the shadows making sure that no one party gets hefty defty with the idea of forced monopolies like the CCP is doing in the USA to allow one party to be destroyed. Which is still yet to be taken into account on how any adverse legal decision to the status quo of forced monopolies are not allowed will be handled.
Rider I
The oppossing idea would say no nobody needs own anything and that all humans could form groups and coahibitions on their own whims and values to vote for status quo. Problem is the reality of human beings, we are dominate intellegent position. If one group is allowed to lead without any proper check without violence we see what goes on in fascist or communist countries. Centralization of wealth like the Soviets, or the Communist Chinese soverign wealth funds, or the basic idea of tribal genocide over those who oppose them like we saw in the Soviet Union of genocide of all Democracy citizens, along with in Communist China the same idea that all farmers or individual home owners where killed and or taken to a desolute place of the country and forced to live there for starvation. and not allowed to farm or survive or figure out how to thrive.
The idea of Fascism and Communist beg the question of violence of change of power. As even when most communist regimes or fascist regimes are voted out peacefully through the idea of the human beings without need of power will just hand over their power when asked. Never happened anytime in human history. It is not human nature. So the best the human species knows of social goverance is Democracy, it allows for capitalism to express whims and desires of the populace by usingn hteir own personally owned and well protected desires and values to be placed in certain areas of leadership. With of course the sacred mac's in the shadows making sure that no one party gets hefty defty with the idea of forced monopolies like the CCP is doing in the USA to allow one party to be destroyed. Which is still yet to be taken into account on how any adverse legal decision to the status quo of forced monopolies are not allowed will be handled.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment