This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation.

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/


"To your self therefore I crave leave to present, what I know you are able to protect; not with sword, but by reason; & not that only, but what by your acceptance you are able to give a lustre to." "You have left no stone unturned, that the turning thereof might conduce to the discovery of what was and worthy to be known."

Henry Agrippa, Chevalier



One man and his mission to hold the Communist Chinese to their contracts to transition into a Free Market and a Democracy. Away from the fascist 75% owned economy by the party and controlled there of, and the non top down people ran country not military run country. One man against the Communist Chinese Party. Viva La Resistonce. You will learn to let go of the smelly blanky.


If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

The reason why I think Communist China green tech should be sanctioned.

Communist China subsidized its green tech industries tens of billions more than the US did. Along with that it used such tactics as forced Intellectual property foreclosure for some companies to compete there or build there. Where as the US does not do that. Along these lines, their mineral resource monopoly is also used and is out right stated as so: they use the monopolies to force companies to build their products there. Then they force companies to be placed into joint ventures when they are forced to build there as their resource monopolies are to uncompetitive. One case study showed after they lied and acted that the SASAC is not a single entity. They then took 30 rare earth resource mines that where acting under cloak of separation to get by monopoly issues in governance and conglomerated them down to one single entity and mining company. They have admitted to use bribes, murder and a number of other issues to obtain the mineral resources. 

In furtherance, the idea that a trade with Communist China will hurt the US or market place is wrong. In reality the trade war will do things like force us to open up our own mines. Which will make the world more competitive. As we can also sell more minerals so that the Communist do not use them like we have seen them do as a war weapon. Along those lines it will do things like allow US citizens to own more business. Instead of centralizing all the industries to the Communist Chinese State Owned Enterprises. Therefore, what we see is a major issue in the world. Where the Communist Chinese propaganda unit constantly states it is a good idea to allow their SOE's to build everything. Which they then use that to control countries as a weapon. Therefore, as an economic military perspective it is better to stand up and stop such dominance and become dominate ourselves. 

Along these lines 80% of the US green tech stimulus money was specifically stripped from US citizens. As per such books as such books as Death by China: Confronting the Dragon explain. Where one company who received millions in funding. Was taken away from the US after receiving those funds. As the Communist Chinese some how received contractual information on how much they received from us. Then they offered them a better contract and cheaper wears. After the US tax funds built the US company a factory. Therefore, we then see economic espionage being used also. This was not the only case. There was other cases where somehow specific information that was only privileged to a few government officials on what companies received stimulus money in our green tech industries. Where also attacked by such econ warfare ideas of getting them to go to Communist China after draining our stimulus treasury. In which, all companies went to the specific government agents who had contractual, technological, and commerce control and asked for help to either compete against the issue that was drawing them out or to stop them from doing it. Which the government officials did not do and allowed 80% of our green tech stimulus to leave the US like that. 

Therefore, as we can see the Communist Chinese manipulated the green tech industry through out subsidizing the US, specific economic forced government legislation and espionage tactics which weakened our economic treasury holdings. I would believe that the case for sanctions would stand. As the US should stand up and say we need to compete. I believe President Obama has been more than willing to look into opening up mining production issues. As they have agreed that the Communist Chinese use of their monopolies on resources is nothing close to barbaric with regards to peaceful economic diplomacy. Thank you as a specialist in this area I would call for sanctions and then mines to be opened for the necessary resources to compete against them and not let them dominate us and the world. This is because like nuclear and physics the energy sector produces new weapons and better economic competition. Therefore, we must look at it as a national security matter.  If we lose like we have been with the weak contract, commerce, and technological leaders have allow us to do. We not only lose for the US but we lose for the world. As the Communist will use their advantage as a bullying neighbor weapon. We have historically always stood up to such SOE tactics and massive subsidizes. As the German Socialist did and the Soviet Union did. I would say we should do it again. 

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment