http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/club-growth
Club for growth is supposed to be a right wing establishment. However, like most right wing establishments that have allowed their free enterprises to be bullied out of their IP and to be forced into joint ventures they are to afraid that they will lose their business, to stand up to the world's biggest government growing much bigger and stronger than the US free market and Democracy.
Therefore, like a weak link. The Club for growth has decided to go against the bill that would stop the world's biggest government ownership of the world market at 97% of the rare earth resources. Which gives them a monopoly on the world supply chain. They have done this as the Club for growth has lead our Republican leader's to think that by stopping the world's most tyrannical government of ownership from entering the US with its goods that it would somehow be bad for our free market and free enterprises. However, like the Chamber of Commerce. They do not take into account the fact that the US is a free market and the Communist Chinese are not a free market. Which means that the Chamber of Commerce and the Club for growth are both advocating for the take over of the US economy by SOE's.
The Communist Chinese have not brought our jobs to them to empower the people of the Chinese people, or even the free enterprises that do not exist there. They have brought them there to empower the SASAC centralized controller of the economy, along with their ability to buy political and market shares. Which is shown through their unhealthy 50% development holdings of the world. This then shows that both entities are in truth a Communist dark hear entity. As they do not wish to help level the playing field for our business. As the Communist Chinese SOE's not the free market nor the people's governments. It is the Communist Chinese SOE's that are taken our jobs from the US free market and forcing them into the Communist Chinese graps.
Thus both entities are not Republican entities. As they do not have the core values to be considered such. I would advise all donors to stop donating to such an entity that has Communist Red's writing reports to help the Communist Chinese further expand their government control of the world market place. Instead of helping the US catch some ground by dealing with reality. Which is what we had to do to the German Socialist and the Soviets. Which is also what the very conservative European Union is doing to the Communist Chinese now. So we can see that the analysts inside of the Club for Growth and the Chamber of Commerce should both receive their last checks or seriously risk losing their funding from the families that have fought against world government control of the market place, over free enterprises and free trade.
I have traced it back to these entities. As they are usually the one's trying to stop the legislation every time it has gone through to help the US balance its economy. Every year it has been stopped is another year the US loses millions of more jobs, industries are completely shut down, and the Communist Chinese expand more than the US and Soviet's combined have done.
Here is the basics of it. The Communist Chinese SOE's have expanded by 1000% of percent's in strength, subsidization power, and expansion. While US and world free markets and free enterprises have declined by thousands of percents. If we take the US alone, the expansion of the SOE's compared to our free enterprises as a historical approach and current. We see the SOE's are leaving room for major areas of being subsidized so the government can control more world market shares. So these two clubs are not protecting free trade. As everyone can agree that SOE's and government procurement's, are not free trade. This means they do not believe in small governance or free enterprises. As they are allowing our's to be destroyed. Which the main reason why we had to subsidize was because the US was going to be bought out by trillion dollar SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds from the Communist Chinese SASAC Cartel's.
One quarter alone the US saw major loss in the negatives of free enterprise percents. Then in that quarter we saw the Communist Chinese SOE's jump over 200% on their point books. Which is based on their ability to manipulate via the SOE banks and military expansion grids. Which is based on the idea that their economy is already on an even playing field, as they are the number one producer's and the worlds number one biggest market. So all number kills are based on level grounds. In which the only answer is currency manipulation across the board.
The problem with the failed analysts. Is they took a micro issue and saw possible government interference. However, they did not properly take the macro issue of the necessary governance and constitutional commerce and protection clause, which we used against the Soviets. As if they would have, they would have seen the kill that the Communist Chinese big major gigantic government ownership was expanding in the world market more than the US free enterprise shares had or currently is. Then if we take it in that matter, we see that it is not a matter of political ideological perspectives. Unless you want the Communist to destroy our country. It is more the idea of facts, and balanced analytically equations with proper data on both sides and an objective view point scewed to free enterprises and not SOE's. Do the math, balance it and you get yes we need to react.
For example a Micro issue against the Conservative core would be to stop the Government from protecting it's SOE's from free enterprises. Which would be normal. However, then we take that issue and we look at it in a macro form. Should not the US protect its free enterprises from the world's biggest SOE and government manipulative economy, or should we live in a radical world where the free market will work. Which we then allow to keep happening to us what is happening. Which is we lose the world's economy while the world's free enterprises are destroyed and major government ownership is recreated to level's surpassing the Soviet Era due to lessened US political and economic clout for free enterprises. As per the free enterprise deficit with the communist Chinese SOE surpluses. So then why would the two clubs supposedly of Conservative values want to protect the Communist Chinese SOE's and manipulative economies, if they are destroying our free enterprises. Which have shrank and not expanded during this deficit of all things to Communist China.
Rider I
Club for growth is supposed to be a right wing establishment. However, like most right wing establishments that have allowed their free enterprises to be bullied out of their IP and to be forced into joint ventures they are to afraid that they will lose their business, to stand up to the world's biggest government growing much bigger and stronger than the US free market and Democracy.
Therefore, like a weak link. The Club for growth has decided to go against the bill that would stop the world's biggest government ownership of the world market at 97% of the rare earth resources. Which gives them a monopoly on the world supply chain. They have done this as the Club for growth has lead our Republican leader's to think that by stopping the world's most tyrannical government of ownership from entering the US with its goods that it would somehow be bad for our free market and free enterprises. However, like the Chamber of Commerce. They do not take into account the fact that the US is a free market and the Communist Chinese are not a free market. Which means that the Chamber of Commerce and the Club for growth are both advocating for the take over of the US economy by SOE's.
The Communist Chinese have not brought our jobs to them to empower the people of the Chinese people, or even the free enterprises that do not exist there. They have brought them there to empower the SASAC centralized controller of the economy, along with their ability to buy political and market shares. Which is shown through their unhealthy 50% development holdings of the world. This then shows that both entities are in truth a Communist dark hear entity. As they do not wish to help level the playing field for our business. As the Communist Chinese SOE's not the free market nor the people's governments. It is the Communist Chinese SOE's that are taken our jobs from the US free market and forcing them into the Communist Chinese graps.
Thus both entities are not Republican entities. As they do not have the core values to be considered such. I would advise all donors to stop donating to such an entity that has Communist Red's writing reports to help the Communist Chinese further expand their government control of the world market place. Instead of helping the US catch some ground by dealing with reality. Which is what we had to do to the German Socialist and the Soviets. Which is also what the very conservative European Union is doing to the Communist Chinese now. So we can see that the analysts inside of the Club for Growth and the Chamber of Commerce should both receive their last checks or seriously risk losing their funding from the families that have fought against world government control of the market place, over free enterprises and free trade.
I have traced it back to these entities. As they are usually the one's trying to stop the legislation every time it has gone through to help the US balance its economy. Every year it has been stopped is another year the US loses millions of more jobs, industries are completely shut down, and the Communist Chinese expand more than the US and Soviet's combined have done.
Here is the basics of it. The Communist Chinese SOE's have expanded by 1000% of percent's in strength, subsidization power, and expansion. While US and world free markets and free enterprises have declined by thousands of percents. If we take the US alone, the expansion of the SOE's compared to our free enterprises as a historical approach and current. We see the SOE's are leaving room for major areas of being subsidized so the government can control more world market shares. So these two clubs are not protecting free trade. As everyone can agree that SOE's and government procurement's, are not free trade. This means they do not believe in small governance or free enterprises. As they are allowing our's to be destroyed. Which the main reason why we had to subsidize was because the US was going to be bought out by trillion dollar SOE's and Sovereign Wealth funds from the Communist Chinese SASAC Cartel's.
One quarter alone the US saw major loss in the negatives of free enterprise percents. Then in that quarter we saw the Communist Chinese SOE's jump over 200% on their point books. Which is based on their ability to manipulate via the SOE banks and military expansion grids. Which is based on the idea that their economy is already on an even playing field, as they are the number one producer's and the worlds number one biggest market. So all number kills are based on level grounds. In which the only answer is currency manipulation across the board.
The problem with the failed analysts. Is they took a micro issue and saw possible government interference. However, they did not properly take the macro issue of the necessary governance and constitutional commerce and protection clause, which we used against the Soviets. As if they would have, they would have seen the kill that the Communist Chinese big major gigantic government ownership was expanding in the world market more than the US free enterprise shares had or currently is. Then if we take it in that matter, we see that it is not a matter of political ideological perspectives. Unless you want the Communist to destroy our country. It is more the idea of facts, and balanced analytically equations with proper data on both sides and an objective view point scewed to free enterprises and not SOE's. Do the math, balance it and you get yes we need to react.
For example a Micro issue against the Conservative core would be to stop the Government from protecting it's SOE's from free enterprises. Which would be normal. However, then we take that issue and we look at it in a macro form. Should not the US protect its free enterprises from the world's biggest SOE and government manipulative economy, or should we live in a radical world where the free market will work. Which we then allow to keep happening to us what is happening. Which is we lose the world's economy while the world's free enterprises are destroyed and major government ownership is recreated to level's surpassing the Soviet Era due to lessened US political and economic clout for free enterprises. As per the free enterprise deficit with the communist Chinese SOE surpluses. So then why would the two clubs supposedly of Conservative values want to protect the Communist Chinese SOE's and manipulative economies, if they are destroying our free enterprises. Which have shrank and not expanded during this deficit of all things to Communist China.
Rider I
No comments:
Post a Comment