This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation.

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/


"To your self therefore I crave leave to present, what I know you are able to protect; not with sword, but by reason; & not that only, but what by your acceptance you are able to give a lustre to." "You have left no stone unturned, that the turning thereof might conduce to the discovery of what was and worthy to be known."

Henry Agrippa, Chevalier



One man and his mission to hold the Communist Chinese to their contracts to transition into a Free Market and a Democracy. Away from the fascist 75% owned economy by the party and controlled there of, and the non top down people ran country not military run country. One man against the Communist Chinese Party. Viva La Resistonce. You will learn to let go of the smelly blanky.


If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Now that communist china has a terrorist definition I will edit my cite as per to stay out of the definition.

http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=1742527

Ok so any comment stating I will advocate to fund their enemies will be taken down, any comments that wish to place pressure on the government outside of an international contract will be taken down. I would have hoped they defined the words under law like the US does for a clearer perspective but I still see it is very vague.

I can only advance my theories under international law if I am not considered a terrorist. So I will have to edit my cite as per their new definition.

When I find the new law of Chinese terrorist definitions. I will edit appropriately to make sure not to be defined as a terrorist.

I do not see the Draft law yet so I do not know what to use to edit my cite.

Rider I

No comments:

Post a Comment