This is an unprofessional Collection cite. That wishes for Speech and Debate with Regards to the topics collected and Special Libraried. I wish for defense of Fair Use Doctrine, not for profit, educational collection. Along with the defense of polemic expression for purpose of creating a dominate point of argumentation.

http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisiii.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisv.blogspot.com/


http://rideriantieconomicwarfaretrisvi.blogspot.com/


"To your self therefore I crave leave to present, what I know you are able to protect; not with sword, but by reason; & not that only, but what by your acceptance you are able to give a lustre to." "You have left no stone unturned, that the turning thereof might conduce to the discovery of what was and worthy to be known."

Henry Agrippa, Chevalier



One man and his mission to hold the Communist Chinese to their contracts to transition into a Free Market and a Democracy. Away from the fascist 75% owned economy by the party and controlled there of, and the non top down people ran country not military run country. One man against the Communist Chinese Party. Viva La Resistonce. You will learn to let go of the smelly blanky.


If you have any problem with IP or copyright laws that you feel are in violation of the research clause that allows me to cite them as per clicking on them. Then please email me at ridereye@gmail.com

US Copy Right Office Fair Use doctrine. Special Libary community common law, and Speech and Debate Congressional research civilian assistant. All legal defenses to copy right infringement.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

My rebuttal to Boehner.

http://news.yahoo.com/senate-takes-first-step-china-yuan-bill-001119095.html

The idea that a bill that harmoniz's with EU is dangerous is like stating, that when a country threatens nuclear war, funded terrorist to attack US soil, funds terrorist to attack US allies, has always been known to manipulate their economy and currency has a military run economy where the government owns 75% of their economy. I think it is dangerous not to pass the bill.

The reason why is that we can't keep allowing Beijing to threaten the US and not do anything about it. If we go into a trade war it will be the best thing for the US and the world. As currently the US does not develop the world. Which has allowed Beijing to develop 50% of the world as per world contract data, and other developmental facts with regards to countries exporting major machinery and projects to bring back foreign treasury to their treasury reserves.

Bejing has not followed it's transitional contracts. Which stated that it would be considered a manipulator so long as they keep the same regime and their is no changes. The MSS has not been disbanded, since they funded Al Queada to attack the US, or since they used military to dominate the world resources at 97%.

I believe around 90% of our business agree that we need to look else where for trade. As currently the US government focuses via Commerce and contract help to the Communist Chinese. Which is because of a possible MSS agent in the lead contractor chair of the US, and a known MSS agent in the UN Development Desa chair. Indian does not do things like let their people steal your IP or allow their espionage units to dominate and bully companies for their IP to do trade with their government run economy. Along with that other countries that need the trade more like the Balkans and the EU, could use it to help out their economy.

So if the US was to go to a trade war. That would mean the world would get out of the economic chaos. Currently caused because of the Communist Chinese have centralized the world's economy to their militarized manipulated economic monopolies controlled by the SASAC. We can see this in history. When the US and other European units started the WTO to fight against the Soviet's who where doing the same thing the Communist Chinese are doing. They all harmonized on the matter. Currently in the world only the EU has stood up to the Communist Chinese and placed a flat tariff on all products as per their manipulative economy.

I think Diplomatically, militarily, and economically it is dangerous not to do it.

Diplomatically, we are leaving the EU all by itself, in the matter of economic warfare. Where we do less trade with the starving Union than we do with the bully fascist mercantilism the Communist Chinese. Which means they are currently more likely to look other places when the US needs help with the war on terrorist. As diplomatically the EU leader's think the US leader's are weak and inable to deal with bullies in the world like the Communist Chinese. Along with that our current weak stance towards them already has left the US alone in the dark. As the Bric was recreated like the Soviet's did. Which is now called the Bloc. Along with that the Communist Chinese due major trade that violates UN treaties, with Iran and North Korea and other countries that are not supposed to be tradeable's. Which in itself is a manipulation as that allows them to have more market's to trade with which keeps their currency low.

Militarily, we need to stop thinking the Communist Chinese will not act like the German Socialist. When we took the same stance we are now which is a weak economic warfare stance. The Communist Chinese have already started the foot of the German Socialist. They have buddies up to all the well know military dictators of the world, exactly like the German Socialist did. They have created the world's biggest submarine fleet's. Which can currently get past all of our radar technology. They have lied about building military weapon's, like the air craft carrier. They stated was just going to be a museum them became fully operational. The German Socialist did the same thing, with their weapon system's, denying their creation of them. Furthermore, the key to the a war cognition is the high espionage. The German Socialist had infiltrated every part of the world with their SOE's and espionage agents. They had stolen more technology from the world, and most strategies than any other country had in history. We see the Communist Chinese doing the same thing. Then idea is we can take all the major countries of the world in history. Then we can easily create a list of all things that each country did before trying to dominate the world. The Communist Chinese have filled up the whole list. Except for the necessary requirement's to break up allied forces. Which they are currently working on to get into NATO and separate the US and other countries from each other's alliances.

Economically, we see the world is in chaos. Not because of the US's financial industry. But because the world can't do anything but service the one centralized country of production, via resource monopolies and SOE cartel's. Which if we look at every major country that is in serious economic turmoil. It is because they are predominately service industries. Where they do not bring enough foreign treasury via international free trade to get them balanced. Which is what happens when monopolies like the Communist Chinese entities are allowed to do. If we take a smaller micro study. We see what monopolies due to area in micro. We can easily apply that equation to macro and see that the world need's another country to be a bigger world trader of goods. Along with that we see specific MSS agents inside of the US economic governance sectors. That are directing the US to trade with the world's biggest manipulator of its economy. This is so they can bully us out of our only advantage which is IP. Then take our mineral' control from us, and starve for our jobs, so they can buy our treasury and then force us to do what they want as they own so much treasury they can do dumping tactics of our treasury to force unfair competition in the world. The funny thing is it would be a good thing. As it would drop the value of our currency. Which would allow us to trade more. So the threat is feeble in reality.

Along with that we do not need Communist China. The world itself stands up to them very well. India does a good job, the EU does a good job and other countries also will not put up with their bullying tactics. So in reality if we passed the bill and they try and go to trade war. It would be a short one. As their whole economy and surplus is based on the US allowing them to bully our economy out of jobs. The President of Communist China has stated that their innovation tactics is to manipulate the world out of its IP to do trade with them. So they can take our jobs and technology. Which means no competition against them. Along with the President of Communist China has stated that they are creating monopolies on resources, so they can take the world's production away from them so their is no competition. Which is all part of the bigger manipulation picture of their currency.

Senators and Representatives, if you fail to do the research and think that it is not a good bill. I suggest you spend some nights reading the articles I have collected. Which will show you everything I have just stated, I believe. As this is my opinion. There is nothing to be scared of, as the EU is already taken the lead on the economic warfare issue with communist China. There are two realities, the one in which we have a weak stance to a fascist economy where it is 75% is still owned by the military and they force party secretaries into all free enterprises and foreign business so they can still control the company based on pressure.

The reality we are currently taking allows the fascist to be empowered. We currently have an analogous weak policy with is analogous to the way we treated the German Socialist before they went to war. As they felt empowered as nobody stopped their bullying at economic warfare face value. The policy that worked the best against such bullies, was the one we used against the Soviet Union. Which was a tough united world front against bullying and manipulative economies, like the Communist Chinese. This then stopped the Soviet's dead in their tracks from trying any major military movements. As they knew right away the world would not put up with bullying in our market places, or in our countries.

I believe the best tactics is a strong front against bullies. As that stops them from being able to bully. The Manipulation we see in Communist China has not stopped in the last 30 years, and will never stop unless we take a stance against economic bullying, which is their manipulative ways. Like we had to do to the Soviet's. The best thing to do is to stand with the EU on the matter of the Communist Chinese economic warfare and currency manipulation.

Rider I
http://rideriantieconomicwarfare.blogspot.com/

In all fairness if Congress does not use my cite's to argue the matter. Then congress is violating the constitution. As I know every single leader and every single major US economic leader knows about my cite. Constitutionally, the Speech and Debate clause falls under research for necessary elements of freedom. A good national security review would be to look at the reason why we are so dominantly pointed at doing business with the Communist Chinese. Then do a specific world nexus and look for Communist Chinese MSS economic warfare espionage agents. As the head of the MSS has an economic engineering degree and mainly on practices economic warfare. As they do very little anti terrorist work in their agency. It is mainly economic warfare. That in itself proves manipulation, along with major connections between the SOE's and the MSS via strategies. And if you think because we have nuclear deterrence. I would like to direct you to the fact that satellites now are powerful enough to hack ICMB's, and the US still can't keep up with the Communist Chinese in cyber warfare.

US has lost's mineral base, so much so the DOD is trying to push through an emergency mineral legislation. As the US DOD business are moving off shore because the US can't compete with the mineral monopolies of the Communist. The US has lost its tax bases. As we have lost over 2.5 million jobs that have not returned. Which where the life blood of this country that created another 5 million from those root economic positions. The world is in decay as they can't compete with the manipulative economy. I would say it is time to be BRAVE and take care of home.

Rider I
If you would like me to come and argue the case, or prepare a brief. I can do that, contact me at ridereye@gmail.com

No comments:

Post a Comment